Belgium vs Guam: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) … square

Belgium
131,769 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Guam
152,956 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Belgium rank
18th
Guam rank
16th

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) … square over time

  • Belgium
  • Guam
050.0k100.0k150.0k200.0k198020002021

How they compare

Guam currently reports 152,956 current US$ per square kilometre against 131,769 current US$ per square kilometre in Belgium, a difference of 21,187 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Guam's figure about 1.2 times Belgium's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 22 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Guam ahead.

Belgium ranks 18th and Guam ranks 16th of 208 countries.

Guam has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belgium Guam Difference Ahead
2000s 83,090 current US$ per square kilometre 136,909 current US$ per square kilometre 53,819 current US$ per square kilometre Guam
2010s 107,569 current US$ per square kilometre 123,139 current US$ per square kilometre 15,570 current US$ per square kilometre Guam
2020s 125,400 current US$ per square kilometre 144,410 current US$ per square kilometre 19,010 current US$ per square kilometre Guam

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square, Belgium or Guam?
Guam, at 152,956 current US$ per square kilometre against 131,769 current US$ per square kilometre in Belgium as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square between Belgium and Guam?
21,187 current US$ per square kilometre, with Guam ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Guam?
22 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2021.
How do Belgium and Guam rank globally for adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square?
Belgium ranks 18th and Guam ranks 16th of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belgium vs Guam: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/belgium/guam/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/belgium/guam/">Belgium vs Guam: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
208 places, 6,698 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.