Belarus vs North Macedonia: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) … square

Belarus
12,693 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
North Macedonia
13,226 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Belarus rank
86th
North Macedonia rank
84th

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) … square over time

  • Belarus
  • North Macedonia
4.0k6.0k8.0k10.0k12.0k14.0k199220062021

How they compare

North Macedonia currently reports 13,226 current US$ per square kilometre against 12,693 current US$ per square kilometre in Belarus, a difference of 533 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Belarus ahead.

Belarus ranks 86th and North Macedonia ranks 84th of 208 countries.

North Macedonia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus North Macedonia Difference Ahead
1990s 4,898 current US$ per square kilometre 5,567 current US$ per square kilometre 669.1 current US$ per square kilometre North Macedonia
2000s 6,331 current US$ per square kilometre 8,209 current US$ per square kilometre 1,878 current US$ per square kilometre North Macedonia
2010s 9,834 current US$ per square kilometre 10,984 current US$ per square kilometre 1,151 current US$ per square kilometre North Macedonia
2020s 12,228 current US$ per square kilometre 12,846 current US$ per square kilometre 617.9 current US$ per square kilometre North Macedonia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square, Belarus or North Macedonia?
North Macedonia, at 13,226 current US$ per square kilometre against 12,693 current US$ per square kilometre in Belarus as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square between Belarus and North Macedonia?
533 current US$ per square kilometre, with North Macedonia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and North Macedonia?
30 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2021.
How do Belarus and North Macedonia rank globally for adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square?
Belarus ranks 86th and North Macedonia ranks 84th of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs North Macedonia: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/belarus/north-macedonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/belarus/north-macedonia/">Belarus vs North Macedonia: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
208 places, 6,698 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.