Belarus vs French Polynesia: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) … square

Belarus
12,693 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
French Polynesia
12,654 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Belarus rank
86th
French Polynesia rank
87th

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) … square over time

  • Belarus
  • French Polynesia
05.0k10.0k15.0k197019952021

How they compare

Belarus currently reports 12,693 current US$ per square kilometre against 12,654 current US$ per square kilometre in French Polynesia, a difference of 39 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Belarus ahead.

Belarus ranks 86th and French Polynesia ranks 87th of 208 countries.

Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus French Polynesia Difference Ahead
1990s 4,898 current US$ per square kilometre 3,038 current US$ per square kilometre 1,860 current US$ per square kilometre Belarus
2000s 6,331 current US$ per square kilometre 6,149 current US$ per square kilometre 181.6 current US$ per square kilometre Belarus
2010s 9,834 current US$ per square kilometre 9,328 current US$ per square kilometre 505.75 current US$ per square kilometre Belarus
2020s 12,228 current US$ per square kilometre 12,039 current US$ per square kilometre 189.05 current US$ per square kilometre Belarus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square, Belarus or French Polynesia?
Belarus, at 12,693 current US$ per square kilometre against 12,654 current US$ per square kilometre in French Polynesia as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square between Belarus and French Polynesia?
39 current US$ per square kilometre, with Belarus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and French Polynesia?
30 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2021.
How do Belarus and French Polynesia rank globally for adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square?
Belarus ranks 86th and French Polynesia ranks 87th of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs French Polynesia: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/belarus/french-polynesia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/belarus/french-polynesia/">Belarus vs French Polynesia: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
208 places, 6,698 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.