Barbados vs Mauritius: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) … square

Barbados
102,630 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Mauritius
80,259 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Barbados rank
24th
Mauritius rank
27th

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) … square over time

  • Barbados
  • Mauritius
0100.0k200.0k300.0k199020052021

How they compare

Barbados currently reports 102,630 current US$ per square kilometre against 80,259 current US$ per square kilometre in Mauritius, a difference of 22,371 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Barbados's figure about 1.3 times Mauritius's.

Across all 32 years both countries report, Barbados has been ahead every year.

Barbados ranks 24th and Mauritius ranks 27th of 208 countries.

Barbados has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Barbados Mauritius Difference Ahead
1990s 38,742 current US$ per square kilometre 11,641 current US$ per square kilometre 27,101 current US$ per square kilometre Barbados
2000s 97,121 current US$ per square kilometre 34,060 current US$ per square kilometre 63,061 current US$ per square kilometre Barbados
2010s 113,062 current US$ per square kilometre 67,827 current US$ per square kilometre 45,235 current US$ per square kilometre Barbados
2020s 101,922 current US$ per square kilometre 77,064 current US$ per square kilometre 24,858 current US$ per square kilometre Barbados

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square, Barbados or Mauritius?
Barbados, at 102,630 current US$ per square kilometre against 80,259 current US$ per square kilometre in Mauritius as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square between Barbados and Mauritius?
22,371 current US$ per square kilometre, with Barbados ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Mauritius?
32 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2021.
How do Barbados and Mauritius rank globally for adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square?
Barbados ranks 24th and Mauritius ranks 27th of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Barbados vs Mauritius: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/barbados/mauritius/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/barbados/mauritius/">Barbados vs Mauritius: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
208 places, 6,698 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.