Australia vs Peru: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) … square

Australia
2,202 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Peru
1,962 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Australia rank
155th
Peru rank
157th

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) … square over time

  • Australia
  • Peru
05001.0k1.5k2.0k199020052021

How they compare

Australia currently reports 2,202 current US$ per square kilometre against 1,962 current US$ per square kilometre in Peru, a difference of 240 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Australia's figure about 1.1 times Peru's.

Across all 32 years both countries report, Australia has been ahead every year.

Australia ranks 155th and Peru ranks 157th of 208 countries.

Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Peru Difference Ahead
1990s 572.53 current US$ per square kilometre 289.81 current US$ per square kilometre 282.72 current US$ per square kilometre Australia
2000s 1,103 current US$ per square kilometre 576.95 current US$ per square kilometre 525.82 current US$ per square kilometre Australia
2010s 1,716 current US$ per square kilometre 1,410 current US$ per square kilometre 305.82 current US$ per square kilometre Australia
2020s 2,135 current US$ per square kilometre 1,803 current US$ per square kilometre 332.4 current US$ per square kilometre Australia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square, Australia or Peru?
Australia, at 2,202 current US$ per square kilometre against 1,962 current US$ per square kilometre in Peru as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square between Australia and Peru?
240 current US$ per square kilometre, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Peru?
32 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2021.
How do Australia and Peru rank globally for adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square?
Australia ranks 155th and Peru ranks 157th of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Peru: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/australia/peru/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/australia/peru/">Australia vs Peru: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
208 places, 6,698 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.