How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Qatar?

32 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2021.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Aruba vs Qatar: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) … square

Aruba

319,464 current US$ per square kilometre

in 2021

Qatar

355,917 current US$ per square kilometre

in 2021

Aruba rank

9th

Qatar rank

7th

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) … square over time

Aruba
Qatar

How they compare

Qatar currently reports 355,917 current US$ per square kilometre against 319,464 current US$ per square kilometre in Aruba, a difference of 36,453 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Qatar's figure about 1.1 times Aruba's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Aruba ahead.

Aruba ranks 9th and Qatar ranks 7th of 208 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Aruba averaged higher in 3 and Qatar in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Aruba	Qatar	Difference	Ahead
1990s	60,831 current US$ per square kilometre	26,335 current US$ per square kilometre	34,497 current US$ per square kilometre	Aruba
2000s	158,037 current US$ per square kilometre	81,489 current US$ per square kilometre	76,548 current US$ per square kilometre	Aruba
2010s	279,494 current US$ per square kilometre	241,101 current US$ per square kilometre	38,393 current US$ per square kilometre	Aruba
2020s	294,002 current US$ per square kilometre	341,383 current US$ per square kilometre	47,380 current US$ per square kilometre	Qatar

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square, Aruba or Qatar?: Qatar, at 355,917 current US$ per square kilometre against 319,464 current US$ per square kilometre in Aruba as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square between Aruba and Qatar?: 36,453 current US$ per square kilometre, with Qatar ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Qatar?: 32 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2021.
How do Aruba and Qatar rank globally for adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square?: Aruba ranks 9th and Qatar ranks 7th of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Aruba vs Qatar: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/aruba/qatar/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/aruba/qatar/">Aruba vs Qatar: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit: current US$ per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 208 places, 6,698 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed: 01 October 2026

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.