Aruba vs Maldives: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) … square

Aruba
319,464 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Maldives
322,448 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Aruba rank
9th
Maldives rank
8th

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) … square over time

  • Aruba
  • Maldives
0100.0k200.0k300.0k197019952021

How they compare

Maldives currently reports 322,448 current US$ per square kilometre against 319,464 current US$ per square kilometre in Aruba, a difference of 2,984 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Aruba ahead.

Aruba ranks 9th and Maldives ranks 8th of 208 countries.

Aruba has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Aruba Maldives Difference Ahead
1990s 60,831 current US$ per square kilometre 13,268 current US$ per square kilometre 47,564 current US$ per square kilometre Aruba
2000s 158,037 current US$ per square kilometre 55,668 current US$ per square kilometre 102,368 current US$ per square kilometre Aruba
2010s 279,494 current US$ per square kilometre 174,799 current US$ per square kilometre 104,695 current US$ per square kilometre Aruba
2020s 294,002 current US$ per square kilometre 263,778 current US$ per square kilometre 30,225 current US$ per square kilometre Aruba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square, Aruba or Maldives?
Maldives, at 322,448 current US$ per square kilometre against 319,464 current US$ per square kilometre in Aruba as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square between Aruba and Maldives?
2,984 current US$ per square kilometre, with Maldives ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Maldives?
32 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2021.
How do Aruba and Maldives rank globally for adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square?
Aruba ranks 9th and Maldives ranks 8th of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Aruba vs Maldives: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/aruba/maldives/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/aruba/maldives/">Aruba vs Maldives: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
208 places, 6,698 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.