Aruba vs South Korea: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) … square

Aruba
319,464 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
South Korea
279,644 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Aruba rank
9th
South Korea rank
11th

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) … square over time

  • Aruba
  • South Korea
0100.0k200.0k300.0k197019952021

How they compare

Aruba currently reports 319,464 current US$ per square kilometre against 279,644 current US$ per square kilometre in South Korea, a difference of 39,820 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Aruba's figure about 1.1 times South Korea's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Aruba ahead.

Aruba ranks 9th and South Korea ranks 11th of 208 countries.

Aruba has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Aruba South Korea Difference Ahead
1990s 60,831 current US$ per square kilometre 55,210 current US$ per square kilometre 5,622 current US$ per square kilometre Aruba
2000s 158,037 current US$ per square kilometre 115,590 current US$ per square kilometre 42,447 current US$ per square kilometre Aruba
2010s 279,494 current US$ per square kilometre 213,944 current US$ per square kilometre 65,550 current US$ per square kilometre Aruba
2020s 294,002 current US$ per square kilometre 268,238 current US$ per square kilometre 25,765 current US$ per square kilometre Aruba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square, Aruba or South Korea?
Aruba, at 319,464 current US$ per square kilometre against 279,644 current US$ per square kilometre in South Korea as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square between Aruba and South Korea?
39,820 current US$ per square kilometre, with Aruba ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and South Korea?
32 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2021.
How do Aruba and South Korea rank globally for adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square?
Aruba ranks 9th and South Korea ranks 11th of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Aruba vs South Korea: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/aruba/korea-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/aruba/korea-rep/">Aruba vs South Korea: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
208 places, 6,698 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.