Afghanistan vs Zambia: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) … square

Afghanistan
279.39 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Zambia
482.14 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Afghanistan rank
198th
Zambia rank
195th

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) … square over time

  • Afghanistan
  • Zambia
0100200300400500199020052021

How they compare

Zambia currently reports 482.14 current US$ per square kilometre against 279.39 current US$ per square kilometre in Afghanistan, a difference of 202.75 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Zambia's figure about 1.7 times Afghanistan's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Zambia ahead.

Afghanistan ranks 198th and Zambia ranks 195th of 208 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Afghanistan averaged higher in 2 and Zambia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Afghanistan Zambia Difference Ahead
1990s 30.95 current US$ per square kilometre 45.96 current US$ per square kilometre 15.02 current US$ per square kilometre Zambia
2000s 69.38 current US$ per square kilometre 65.04 current US$ per square kilometre 4.34 current US$ per square kilometre Afghanistan
2010s 328.16 current US$ per square kilometre 240.21 current US$ per square kilometre 87.96 current US$ per square kilometre Afghanistan
2020s 317.78 current US$ per square kilometre 442.35 current US$ per square kilometre 124.57 current US$ per square kilometre Zambia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square, Afghanistan or Zambia?
Zambia, at 482.14 current US$ per square kilometre against 279.39 current US$ per square kilometre in Afghanistan as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square between Afghanistan and Zambia?
202.75 current US$ per square kilometre, with Zambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Zambia?
32 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2021.
How do Afghanistan and Zambia rank globally for adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square?
Afghanistan ranks 198th and Zambia ranks 195th of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Afghanistan vs Zambia: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/afghanistan/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/afghanistan/zambia/">Afghanistan vs Zambia: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
208 places, 6,698 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.