Afghanistan vs Namibia: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) … square

Afghanistan
279.39 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Namibia
220.8 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Afghanistan rank
198th
Namibia rank
200th

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) … square over time

  • Afghanistan
  • Namibia
0100200300400199020052021

How they compare

Afghanistan currently reports 279.39 current US$ per square kilometre against 220.8 current US$ per square kilometre in Namibia, a difference of 58.59 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Afghanistan's figure about 1.3 times Namibia's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Afghanistan ahead.

Afghanistan ranks 198th and Namibia ranks 200th of 208 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Afghanistan averaged higher in 2 and Namibia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Afghanistan Namibia Difference Ahead
1990s 29.47 current US$ per square kilometre 31.64 current US$ per square kilometre 2.17 current US$ per square kilometre Namibia
2000s 69.38 current US$ per square kilometre 70.19 current US$ per square kilometre 0.8074 current US$ per square kilometre Namibia
2010s 328.16 current US$ per square kilometre 163.48 current US$ per square kilometre 164.68 current US$ per square kilometre Afghanistan
2020s 317.78 current US$ per square kilometre 210.5 current US$ per square kilometre 107.28 current US$ per square kilometre Afghanistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square, Afghanistan or Namibia?
Afghanistan, at 279.39 current US$ per square kilometre against 220.8 current US$ per square kilometre in Namibia as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square between Afghanistan and Namibia?
58.59 current US$ per square kilometre, with Afghanistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Namibia?
31 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2021.
How do Afghanistan and Namibia rank globally for adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square?
Afghanistan ranks 198th and Namibia ranks 200th of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Afghanistan vs Namibia: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/afghanistan/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/afghanistan/namibia/">Afghanistan vs Namibia: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
208 places, 6,698 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.