Sudan vs Zambia: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per capita

Sudan
20.04 current US$ per person
in 2021
Zambia
18.28 current US$ per person
in 2021
Sudan rank
177th
Zambia rank
179th

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per capita over time

  • Sudan
  • Zambia
05101520199020052021

How they compare

Sudan currently reports 20.04 current US$ per person against 18.28 current US$ per person in Zambia, a difference of 1.76 current US$ per person.

That makes Sudan's figure about 1.1 times Zambia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Zambia ahead.

Sudan ranks 177th and Zambia ranks 179th of 210 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Sudan averaged higher in 3 and Zambia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Sudan Zambia Difference Ahead
1990s 2.86 current US$ per person 3.95 current US$ per person 1.09 current US$ per person Zambia
2000s 7.83 current US$ per person 4.12 current US$ per person 3.71 current US$ per person Sudan
2010s 15.66 current US$ per person 10.72 current US$ per person 4.94 current US$ per person Sudan
2020s 19.41 current US$ per person 16.99 current US$ per person 2.41 current US$ per person Sudan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per capita, Sudan or Zambia?
Sudan, at 20.04 current US$ per person against 18.28 current US$ per person in Zambia as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per capita between Sudan and Zambia?
1.76 current US$ per person, with Sudan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sudan and Zambia?
32 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2021.
How do Sudan and Zambia rank globally for adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per capita?
Sudan ranks 177th and Zambia ranks 179th of 210 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sudan vs Zambia: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 07 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-capita/sudan/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-capita/sudan/zambia/">Sudan vs Zambia: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per capita
Unit
current US$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
210 places, 6,886 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.