Spain vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per capita

Spain
203.7 current US$ per person
in 2021
Turks and Caicos Islands
218.81 current US$ per person
in 2021
Spain rank
69th
Turks and Caicos Islands rank
66th

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per capita over time

  • Spain
  • Turks and Caicos Islands
050100150200250199020052021

How they compare

Turks and Caicos Islands currently reports 218.81 current US$ per person against 203.7 current US$ per person in Spain, a difference of 15.11 current US$ per person.

That makes Turks and Caicos Islands's figure about 1.1 times Spain's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 21 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Spain ahead.

Spain ranks 69th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 66th of 210 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Spain averaged higher in 1 and Turks and Caicos Islands in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Spain Turks and Caicos Islands Difference Ahead
2000s 173.51 current US$ per person 46.59 current US$ per person 126.91 current US$ per person Spain
2010s 188.22 current US$ per person 203.06 current US$ per person 14.84 current US$ per person Turks and Caicos Islands
2020s 194.52 current US$ per person 207.47 current US$ per person 12.95 current US$ per person Turks and Caicos Islands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per capita, Spain or Turks and Caicos Islands?
Turks and Caicos Islands, at 218.81 current US$ per person against 203.7 current US$ per person in Spain as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per capita between Spain and Turks and Caicos Islands?
15.11 current US$ per person, with Turks and Caicos Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Spain and Turks and Caicos Islands?
21 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2021.
How do Spain and Turks and Caicos Islands rank globally for adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per capita?
Spain ranks 69th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 66th of 210 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Spain vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 07 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-capita/spain/turks-and-caicos-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-capita/spain/turks-and-caicos-islands/">Spain vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per capita
Unit
current US$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
210 places, 6,886 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.