Sao Tome and Principe vs Zimbabwe: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per capita

Sao Tome and Principe
32.1 current US$ per person
in 2021
Zimbabwe
31.63 current US$ per person
in 2021
Sao Tome and Principe rank
164th
Zimbabwe rank
166th

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per capita over time

  • Sao Tome and Principe
  • Zimbabwe
0102030199020052021

How they compare

Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 32.1 current US$ per person against 31.63 current US$ per person in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.47 current US$ per person.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Sao Tome and Principe ranks 164th and Zimbabwe ranks 166th of 210 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Sao Tome and Principe averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Sao Tome and Principe Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 5.38 current US$ per person 21.65 current US$ per person 16.27 current US$ per person Zimbabwe
2000s 10.39 current US$ per person 19 current US$ per person 8.61 current US$ per person Zimbabwe
2010s 21.59 current US$ per person 27.64 current US$ per person 6.05 current US$ per person Zimbabwe
2020s 31.08 current US$ per person 30.12 current US$ per person 0.9615 current US$ per person Sao Tome and Principe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per capita, Sao Tome and Principe or Zimbabwe?
Sao Tome and Principe, at 32.1 current US$ per person against 31.63 current US$ per person in Zimbabwe as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per capita between Sao Tome and Principe and Zimbabwe?
0.47 current US$ per person, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sao Tome and Principe and Zimbabwe?
32 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2021.
How do Sao Tome and Principe and Zimbabwe rank globally for adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per capita?
Sao Tome and Principe ranks 164th and Zimbabwe ranks 166th of 210 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sao Tome and Principe vs Zimbabwe: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 07 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-capita/sao-tome-and-principe/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-capita/sao-tome-and-principe/zimbabwe/">Sao Tome and Principe vs Zimbabwe: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per capita
Unit
current US$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
210 places, 6,886 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.