Papua New Guinea vs East Timor: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per capita

Papua New Guinea
33.67 current US$ per person
in 2021
East Timor
33.91 current US$ per person
in 2021
Papua New Guinea rank
162nd
East Timor rank
161st

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per capita over time

  • Papua New Guinea
  • East Timor
0102030199020052021

How they compare

East Timor currently reports 33.91 current US$ per person against 33.67 current US$ per person in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 0.24 current US$ per person.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 20 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Papua New Guinea ahead.

Papua New Guinea ranks 162nd and East Timor ranks 161st of 210 countries.

Papua New Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Papua New Guinea East Timor Difference Ahead
2000s 16.71 current US$ per person 4.91 current US$ per person 11.8 current US$ per person Papua New Guinea
2010s 25.22 current US$ per person 13.81 current US$ per person 11.4 current US$ per person Papua New Guinea
2020s 32.75 current US$ per person 31.1 current US$ per person 1.65 current US$ per person Papua New Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per capita, Papua New Guinea or East Timor?
East Timor, at 33.91 current US$ per person against 33.67 current US$ per person in Papua New Guinea as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per capita between Papua New Guinea and East Timor?
0.24 current US$ per person, with East Timor ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Papua New Guinea and East Timor?
20 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2021.
How do Papua New Guinea and East Timor rank globally for adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per capita?
Papua New Guinea ranks 162nd and East Timor ranks 161st of 210 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Papua New Guinea vs East Timor: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 07 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-capita/papua-new-guinea/timor-leste/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-capita/papua-new-guinea/timor-leste/">Papua New Guinea vs East Timor: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per capita
Unit
current US$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
210 places, 6,886 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.