Papua New Guinea vs Sao Tome and Principe: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per capita

Papua New Guinea
33.67 current US$ per person
in 2021
Sao Tome and Principe
32.1 current US$ per person
in 2021
Papua New Guinea rank
162nd
Sao Tome and Principe rank
164th

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per capita over time

  • Papua New Guinea
  • Sao Tome and Principe
0102030199020052021

How they compare

Papua New Guinea currently reports 33.67 current US$ per person against 32.1 current US$ per person in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 1.57 current US$ per person.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Papua New Guinea ahead.

Papua New Guinea ranks 162nd and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 164th of 210 countries.

Papua New Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Papua New Guinea Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
1990s 7.44 current US$ per person 5.38 current US$ per person 2.06 current US$ per person Papua New Guinea
2000s 15.46 current US$ per person 10.39 current US$ per person 5.08 current US$ per person Papua New Guinea
2010s 25.22 current US$ per person 21.59 current US$ per person 3.62 current US$ per person Papua New Guinea
2020s 32.75 current US$ per person 31.08 current US$ per person 1.66 current US$ per person Papua New Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per capita, Papua New Guinea or Sao Tome and Principe?
Papua New Guinea, at 33.67 current US$ per person against 32.1 current US$ per person in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per capita between Papua New Guinea and Sao Tome and Principe?
1.57 current US$ per person, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Papua New Guinea and Sao Tome and Principe?
32 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2021.
How do Papua New Guinea and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per capita?
Papua New Guinea ranks 162nd and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 164th of 210 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Papua New Guinea vs Sao Tome and Principe: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 07 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-capita/papua-new-guinea/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-capita/papua-new-guinea/sao-tome-and-principe/">Papua New Guinea vs Sao Tome and Principe: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per capita
Unit
current US$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
210 places, 6,886 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.