New Caledonia vs United States Virgin Islands: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per capita

New Caledonia
901.81 current US$ per person
in 2021
United States Virgin Islands
1,023 current US$ per person
in 2021
New Caledonia rank
4th
United States Virgin Islands rank
2nd

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per capita over time

  • New Caledonia
  • United States Virgin Islands
01.0k2.0k3.0k197019952021

How they compare

United States Virgin Islands currently reports 1,023 current US$ per person against 901.81 current US$ per person in New Caledonia, a difference of 121.19 current US$ per person.

That makes United States Virgin Islands's figure about 1.1 times New Caledonia's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 42 shared years of data; in 1980 it was United States Virgin Islands ahead.

New Caledonia ranks 4th and United States Virgin Islands ranks 2nd of 210 countries.

United States Virgin Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade New Caledonia United States Virgin Islands Difference Ahead
1980s 77.8 current US$ per person 180.06 current US$ per person 102.26 current US$ per person United States Virgin Islands
1990s 128.49 current US$ per person 346.61 current US$ per person 218.12 current US$ per person United States Virgin Islands
2000s 250.29 current US$ per person 2,261 current US$ per person 2,010 current US$ per person United States Virgin Islands
2010s 556.1 current US$ per person 921.1 current US$ per person 365 current US$ per person United States Virgin Islands
2020s 863.95 current US$ per person 964.21 current US$ per person 100.26 current US$ per person United States Virgin Islands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per capita, New Caledonia or United States Virgin Islands?
United States Virgin Islands, at 1,023 current US$ per person against 901.81 current US$ per person in New Caledonia as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per capita between New Caledonia and United States Virgin Islands?
121.19 current US$ per person, with United States Virgin Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for New Caledonia and United States Virgin Islands?
42 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2021.
How do New Caledonia and United States Virgin Islands rank globally for adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per capita?
New Caledonia ranks 4th and United States Virgin Islands ranks 2nd of 210 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

New Caledonia vs United States Virgin Islands: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 07 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-capita/new-caledonia/virgin-islands-u-s/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-capita/new-caledonia/virgin-islands-u-s/">New Caledonia vs United States Virgin Islands: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per capita
Unit
current US$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
210 places, 6,886 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.