Mauritius vs Sweden: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per capita

Mauritius
126.57 current US$ per person
in 2021
Sweden
140.38 current US$ per person
in 2021
Mauritius rank
109th
Sweden rank
106th

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per capita over time

  • Mauritius
  • Sweden
050100150199020052021

How they compare

Sweden currently reports 140.38 current US$ per person against 126.57 current US$ per person in Mauritius, a difference of 13.81 current US$ per person.

That makes Sweden's figure about 1.1 times Mauritius's.

Across all 32 years both countries report, Sweden has been ahead every year.

Mauritius ranks 109th and Sweden ranks 106th of 210 countries.

Sweden has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritius Sweden Difference Ahead
1990s 20.99 current US$ per person 98.27 current US$ per person 77.28 current US$ per person Sweden
2000s 56.39 current US$ per person 126.48 current US$ per person 70.09 current US$ per person Sweden
2010s 107.55 current US$ per person 139.65 current US$ per person 32.1 current US$ per person Sweden
2020s 121.54 current US$ per person 136.47 current US$ per person 14.93 current US$ per person Sweden

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per capita, Mauritius or Sweden?
Sweden, at 140.38 current US$ per person against 126.57 current US$ per person in Mauritius as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per capita between Mauritius and Sweden?
13.81 current US$ per person, with Sweden ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Sweden?
32 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2021.
How do Mauritius and Sweden rank globally for adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per capita?
Mauritius ranks 109th and Sweden ranks 106th of 210 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritius vs Sweden: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 07 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-capita/mauritius/sweden/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-capita/mauritius/sweden/">Mauritius vs Sweden: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per capita
Unit
current US$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
210 places, 6,886 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.