Libya vs Singapore: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per capita

Libya
368.63 current US$ per person
in 2021
Singapore
384.39 current US$ per person
in 2021
Libya rank
29th
Singapore rank
26th

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per capita over time

  • Libya
  • Singapore
100200300400199020052021

How they compare

Singapore currently reports 384.39 current US$ per person against 368.63 current US$ per person in Libya, a difference of 15.76 current US$ per person.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Singapore ahead.

Libya ranks 29th and Singapore ranks 26th of 210 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Libya averaged higher in 1 and Singapore in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Libya Singapore Difference Ahead
1990s 114.81 current US$ per person 151.31 current US$ per person 36.5 current US$ per person Singapore
2000s 196.19 current US$ per person 204.65 current US$ per person 8.45 current US$ per person Singapore
2010s 286.58 current US$ per person 286.45 current US$ per person 0.1361 current US$ per person Libya
2020s 315.56 current US$ per person 356.66 current US$ per person 41.1 current US$ per person Singapore

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per capita, Libya or Singapore?
Singapore, at 384.39 current US$ per person against 368.63 current US$ per person in Libya as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per capita between Libya and Singapore?
15.76 current US$ per person, with Singapore ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Singapore?
32 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2021.
How do Libya and Singapore rank globally for adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per capita?
Libya ranks 29th and Singapore ranks 26th of 210 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Libya vs Singapore: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 07 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-capita/libya/singapore/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-capita/libya/singapore/">Libya vs Singapore: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per capita
Unit
current US$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
210 places, 6,886 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.