Italy vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per capita

Italy
222.35 current US$ per person
in 2021
Turks and Caicos Islands
218.81 current US$ per person
in 2021
Italy rank
64th
Turks and Caicos Islands rank
66th

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per capita over time

  • Italy
  • Turks and Caicos Islands
050100150200250199020052021

How they compare

Italy currently reports 222.35 current US$ per person against 218.81 current US$ per person in Turks and Caicos Islands, a difference of 3.54 current US$ per person.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Italy ahead.

Italy ranks 64th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 66th of 210 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Italy averaged higher in 2 and Turks and Caicos Islands in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Italy Turks and Caicos Islands Difference Ahead
2000s 180.81 current US$ per person 46.59 current US$ per person 134.22 current US$ per person Italy
2010s 198.23 current US$ per person 203.06 current US$ per person 4.83 current US$ per person Turks and Caicos Islands
2020s 210.9 current US$ per person 207.47 current US$ per person 3.43 current US$ per person Italy

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per capita, Italy or Turks and Caicos Islands?
Italy, at 222.35 current US$ per person against 218.81 current US$ per person in Turks and Caicos Islands as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per capita between Italy and Turks and Caicos Islands?
3.54 current US$ per person, with Italy ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Italy and Turks and Caicos Islands?
21 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2021.
How do Italy and Turks and Caicos Islands rank globally for adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per capita?
Italy ranks 64th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 66th of 210 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Italy vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 07 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-capita/italy/turks-and-caicos-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-capita/italy/turks-and-caicos-islands/">Italy vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per capita
Unit
current US$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
210 places, 6,886 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.