Guinea-Bissau vs South Sudan: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per capita

Guinea-Bissau
7.38 current US$ per person
in 2021
South Sudan
7.42 current US$ per person
in 2021
Guinea-Bissau rank
198th
South Sudan rank
197th

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per capita over time

  • Guinea-Bissau
  • South Sudan
02468199020052021

How they compare

South Sudan currently reports 7.42 current US$ per person against 7.38 current US$ per person in Guinea-Bissau, a difference of 0.04 current US$ per person.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Guinea-Bissau ahead.

Guinea-Bissau ranks 198th and South Sudan ranks 197th of 210 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Guinea-Bissau averaged higher in 3 and South Sudan in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guinea-Bissau South Sudan Difference Ahead
1990s 2.45 current US$ per person 1.08 current US$ per person 1.37 current US$ per person Guinea-Bissau
2000s 3.28 current US$ per person 2.74 current US$ per person 0.5407 current US$ per person Guinea-Bissau
2010s 5.46 current US$ per person 5.05 current US$ per person 0.4054 current US$ per person Guinea-Bissau
2020s 7.08 current US$ per person 7.15 current US$ per person 0.0739 current US$ per person South Sudan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per capita, Guinea-Bissau or South Sudan?
South Sudan, at 7.42 current US$ per person against 7.38 current US$ per person in Guinea-Bissau as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per capita between Guinea-Bissau and South Sudan?
0.04 current US$ per person, with South Sudan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and South Sudan?
32 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2021.
How do Guinea-Bissau and South Sudan rank globally for adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per capita?
Guinea-Bissau ranks 198th and South Sudan ranks 197th of 210 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guinea-Bissau vs South Sudan: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 07 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-capita/guinea-bissau/south-sudan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-capita/guinea-bissau/south-sudan/">Guinea-Bissau vs South Sudan: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per capita
Unit
current US$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
210 places, 6,886 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.