Gibraltar vs United Arab Emirates: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per capita

Gibraltar
820.02 current US$ per person
in 2021
United Arab Emirates
836.87 current US$ per person
in 2021
Gibraltar rank
7th
United Arab Emirates rank
6th

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per capita over time

  • Gibraltar
  • United Arab Emirates
0200400600800197019952021

How they compare

United Arab Emirates currently reports 836.87 current US$ per person against 820.02 current US$ per person in Gibraltar, a difference of 16.85 current US$ per person.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1990 it was United Arab Emirates ahead.

Gibraltar ranks 7th and United Arab Emirates ranks 6th of 210 countries.

United Arab Emirates has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Gibraltar United Arab Emirates Difference Ahead
1990s 146.75 current US$ per person 433.75 current US$ per person 287.01 current US$ per person United Arab Emirates
2000s 314.5 current US$ per person 562.08 current US$ per person 247.58 current US$ per person United Arab Emirates
2010s 594.87 current US$ per person 762.11 current US$ per person 167.24 current US$ per person United Arab Emirates
2020s 790.61 current US$ per person 811.87 current US$ per person 21.26 current US$ per person United Arab Emirates

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per capita, Gibraltar or United Arab Emirates?
United Arab Emirates, at 836.87 current US$ per person against 820.02 current US$ per person in Gibraltar as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per capita between Gibraltar and United Arab Emirates?
16.85 current US$ per person, with United Arab Emirates ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Gibraltar and United Arab Emirates?
32 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2021.
How do Gibraltar and United Arab Emirates rank globally for adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per capita?
Gibraltar ranks 7th and United Arab Emirates ranks 6th of 210 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Gibraltar vs United Arab Emirates: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 07 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-capita/gibraltar/united-arab-emirates/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-capita/gibraltar/united-arab-emirates/">Gibraltar vs United Arab Emirates: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per capita
Unit
current US$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
210 places, 6,886 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.