Gibraltar vs Saudi Arabia: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per capita

Gibraltar
820.02 current US$ per person
in 2021
Saudi Arabia
744.88 current US$ per person
in 2021
Gibraltar rank
7th
Saudi Arabia rank
9th

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per capita over time

  • Gibraltar
  • Saudi Arabia
0200400600800197019952021

How they compare

Gibraltar currently reports 820.02 current US$ per person against 744.88 current US$ per person in Saudi Arabia, a difference of 75.14 current US$ per person.

That makes Gibraltar's figure about 1.1 times Saudi Arabia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Saudi Arabia ahead.

Gibraltar ranks 7th and Saudi Arabia ranks 9th of 210 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Gibraltar averaged higher in 1 and Saudi Arabia in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Gibraltar Saudi Arabia Difference Ahead
1990s 146.75 current US$ per person 239.55 current US$ per person 92.8 current US$ per person Saudi Arabia
2000s 314.5 current US$ per person 359.82 current US$ per person 45.33 current US$ per person Saudi Arabia
2010s 594.87 current US$ per person 625.49 current US$ per person 30.62 current US$ per person Saudi Arabia
2020s 790.61 current US$ per person 705.18 current US$ per person 85.42 current US$ per person Gibraltar

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per capita, Gibraltar or Saudi Arabia?
Gibraltar, at 820.02 current US$ per person against 744.88 current US$ per person in Saudi Arabia as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per capita between Gibraltar and Saudi Arabia?
75.14 current US$ per person, with Gibraltar ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Gibraltar and Saudi Arabia?
32 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2021.
How do Gibraltar and Saudi Arabia rank globally for adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per capita?
Gibraltar ranks 7th and Saudi Arabia ranks 9th of 210 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Gibraltar vs Saudi Arabia: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 07 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-capita/gibraltar/saudi-arabia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-capita/gibraltar/saudi-arabia/">Gibraltar vs Saudi Arabia: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per capita
Unit
current US$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
210 places, 6,886 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.