Georgia vs Sweden: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per capita

Georgia
132.45 current US$ per person
in 2021
Sweden
140.38 current US$ per person
in 2021
Georgia rank
107th
Sweden rank
106th

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per capita over time

  • Georgia
  • Sweden
050100150199020052021

How they compare

Sweden currently reports 140.38 current US$ per person against 132.45 current US$ per person in Georgia, a difference of 7.93 current US$ per person.

That makes Sweden's figure about 1.1 times Georgia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Georgia ahead.

Georgia ranks 107th and Sweden ranks 106th of 210 countries.

Sweden has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Georgia Sweden Difference Ahead
1990s 39.46 current US$ per person 98.27 current US$ per person 58.81 current US$ per person Sweden
2000s 25.64 current US$ per person 126.48 current US$ per person 100.83 current US$ per person Sweden
2010s 78.46 current US$ per person 139.65 current US$ per person 61.19 current US$ per person Sweden
2020s 120.9 current US$ per person 136.47 current US$ per person 15.58 current US$ per person Sweden

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per capita, Georgia or Sweden?
Sweden, at 140.38 current US$ per person against 132.45 current US$ per person in Georgia as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per capita between Georgia and Sweden?
7.93 current US$ per person, with Sweden ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Sweden?
32 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2021.
How do Georgia and Sweden rank globally for adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per capita?
Georgia ranks 107th and Sweden ranks 106th of 210 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Georgia vs Sweden: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 07 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-capita/georgia/sweden/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-capita/georgia/sweden/">Georgia vs Sweden: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per capita
Unit
current US$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
210 places, 6,886 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.