Faroe Islands vs Saudi Arabia: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per capita

Faroe Islands
711.36 current US$ per person
in 2021
Saudi Arabia
744.88 current US$ per person
in 2021
Faroe Islands rank
10th
Saudi Arabia rank
9th

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per capita over time

  • Faroe Islands
  • Saudi Arabia
200400600800199020052021

How they compare

Saudi Arabia currently reports 744.88 current US$ per person against 711.36 current US$ per person in Faroe Islands, a difference of 33.52 current US$ per person.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Saudi Arabia ahead.

Faroe Islands ranks 10th and Saudi Arabia ranks 9th of 210 countries.

Saudi Arabia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Faroe Islands Saudi Arabia Difference Ahead
1990s 231.84 current US$ per person 248.08 current US$ per person 16.24 current US$ per person Saudi Arabia
2000s 337.48 current US$ per person 359.82 current US$ per person 22.35 current US$ per person Saudi Arabia
2010s 534.17 current US$ per person 625.49 current US$ per person 91.32 current US$ per person Saudi Arabia
2020s 676.66 current US$ per person 705.18 current US$ per person 28.53 current US$ per person Saudi Arabia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per capita, Faroe Islands or Saudi Arabia?
Saudi Arabia, at 744.88 current US$ per person against 711.36 current US$ per person in Faroe Islands as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per capita between Faroe Islands and Saudi Arabia?
33.52 current US$ per person, with Saudi Arabia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Faroe Islands and Saudi Arabia?
30 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2021.
How do Faroe Islands and Saudi Arabia rank globally for adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per capita?
Faroe Islands ranks 10th and Saudi Arabia ranks 9th of 210 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Faroe Islands vs Saudi Arabia: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 07 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-capita/faroe-islands/saudi-arabia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-capita/faroe-islands/saudi-arabia/">Faroe Islands vs Saudi Arabia: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per capita
Unit
current US$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
210 places, 6,886 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.