Equatorial Guinea vs Panama: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per capita

Equatorial Guinea
120.87 current US$ per person
in 2021
Panama
121.63 current US$ per person
in 2021
Equatorial Guinea rank
111th
Panama rank
110th

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per capita over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Panama
050100150200250199020052021

How they compare

Panama currently reports 121.63 current US$ per person against 120.87 current US$ per person in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0.76 current US$ per person.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Panama ahead.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 111th and Panama ranks 110th of 210 countries.

Equatorial Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Panama Difference Ahead
1990s 32.39 current US$ per person 23.15 current US$ per person 9.24 current US$ per person Equatorial Guinea
2000s 166.65 current US$ per person 46.51 current US$ per person 120.14 current US$ per person Equatorial Guinea
2010s 186.68 current US$ per person 92.47 current US$ per person 94.21 current US$ per person Equatorial Guinea
2020s 121.17 current US$ per person 112.68 current US$ per person 8.49 current US$ per person Equatorial Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per capita, Equatorial Guinea or Panama?
Panama, at 121.63 current US$ per person against 120.87 current US$ per person in Equatorial Guinea as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per capita between Equatorial Guinea and Panama?
0.76 current US$ per person, with Panama ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Panama?
32 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2021.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Panama rank globally for adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per capita?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 111th and Panama ranks 110th of 210 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs Panama: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 07 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-capita/equatorial-guinea/panama/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-capita/equatorial-guinea/panama/">Equatorial Guinea vs Panama: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per capita
Unit
current US$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
210 places, 6,886 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.