Equatorial Guinea vs Malta: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per capita

Equatorial Guinea
120.87 current US$ per person
in 2021
Malta
110.89 current US$ per person
in 2021
Equatorial Guinea rank
111th
Malta rank
112th

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per capita over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Malta
050100150200250199020052021

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports 120.87 current US$ per person against 110.89 current US$ per person in Malta, a difference of 9.98 current US$ per person.

That makes Equatorial Guinea's figure about 1.1 times Malta's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Malta ahead.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 111th and Malta ranks 112th of 210 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 3 and Malta in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Malta Difference Ahead
1990s 32.39 current US$ per person 95.62 current US$ per person 63.23 current US$ per person Malta
2000s 166.65 current US$ per person 145.34 current US$ per person 21.31 current US$ per person Equatorial Guinea
2010s 186.68 current US$ per person 154.58 current US$ per person 32.1 current US$ per person Equatorial Guinea
2020s 121.17 current US$ per person 109.74 current US$ per person 11.43 current US$ per person Equatorial Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per capita, Equatorial Guinea or Malta?
Equatorial Guinea, at 120.87 current US$ per person against 110.89 current US$ per person in Malta as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per capita between Equatorial Guinea and Malta?
9.98 current US$ per person, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Malta?
32 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2021.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Malta rank globally for adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per capita?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 111th and Malta ranks 112th of 210 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs Malta: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 07 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-capita/equatorial-guinea/malta/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-capita/equatorial-guinea/malta/">Equatorial Guinea vs Malta: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per capita
Unit
current US$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
210 places, 6,886 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.