Congo vs Guatemala: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per capita

Congo
55.19 current US$ per person
in 2021
Guatemala
55.56 current US$ per person
in 2021
Congo rank
149th
Guatemala rank
147th

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per capita over time

  • Congo
  • Guatemala
0204060199020052021

How they compare

Guatemala currently reports 55.56 current US$ per person against 55.19 current US$ per person in Congo, a difference of 0.37 current US$ per person.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Congo ahead.

Congo ranks 149th and Guatemala ranks 147th of 210 countries.

Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Guatemala Difference Ahead
1990s 17.24 current US$ per person 8.71 current US$ per person 8.53 current US$ per person Congo
2000s 25.3 current US$ per person 19.4 current US$ per person 5.9 current US$ per person Congo
2010s 38.79 current US$ per person 32.88 current US$ per person 5.92 current US$ per person Congo
2020s 53.59 current US$ per person 51.52 current US$ per person 2.08 current US$ per person Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per capita, Congo or Guatemala?
Guatemala, at 55.56 current US$ per person against 55.19 current US$ per person in Congo as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per capita between Congo and Guatemala?
0.37 current US$ per person, with Guatemala ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Guatemala?
32 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2021.
How do Congo and Guatemala rank globally for adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per capita?
Congo ranks 149th and Guatemala ranks 147th of 210 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Guatemala: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 07 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-capita/congo-rep/guatemala/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-capita/congo-rep/guatemala/">Congo vs Guatemala: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per capita
Unit
current US$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
210 places, 6,886 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.