How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Nauru?

32 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2021.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Chile vs Nauru: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per capita

Chile

221.14 current US$ per person

in 2021

Nauru

222.71 current US$ per person

in 2021

Chile rank

65th

Nauru rank

63rd

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per capita over time

Chile
Nauru

How they compare

Nauru currently reports 222.71 current US$ per person against 221.14 current US$ per person in Chile, a difference of 1.57 current US$ per person.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Nauru ahead.

Chile ranks 65th and Nauru ranks 63rd of 210 countries.

Nauru has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Chile	Nauru	Difference	Ahead
1990s	42.11 current US$ per person	161.36 current US$ per person	119.24 current US$ per person	Nauru
2000s	80.24 current US$ per person	138.18 current US$ per person	57.95 current US$ per person	Nauru
2010s	156.02 current US$ per person	169.44 current US$ per person	13.42 current US$ per person	Nauru
2020s	203.94 current US$ per person	217.97 current US$ per person	14.03 current US$ per person	Nauru

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per capita, Chile or Nauru?: Nauru, at 222.71 current US$ per person against 221.14 current US$ per person in Chile as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per capita between Chile and Nauru?: 1.57 current US$ per person, with Nauru ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Nauru?: 32 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2021.
How do Chile and Nauru rank globally for adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per capita?: Chile ranks 65th and Nauru ranks 63rd of 210 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Nauru: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 07 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-capita/chile/naoero/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-capita/chile/naoero/">Chile vs Nauru: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per capita
Unit: current US$ per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 210 places, 6,886 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed: 01 October 2026

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.