How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and Sri Lanka?

32 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2021.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Cape Verde vs Sri Lanka: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per capita

Cape Verde

50.97 current US$ per person

in 2021

Sri Lanka

49.82 current US$ per person

in 2021

Cape Verde rank

150th

Sri Lanka rank

151st

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per capita over time

Cape Verde
Sri Lanka

How they compare

Cape Verde currently reports 50.97 current US$ per person against 49.82 current US$ per person in Sri Lanka, a difference of 1.15 current US$ per person.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Cape Verde ahead.

Cape Verde ranks 150th and Sri Lanka ranks 151st of 210 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Cape Verde averaged higher in 3 and Sri Lanka in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Cape Verde	Sri Lanka	Difference	Ahead
1990s	4.72 current US$ per person	5.61 current US$ per person	0.8913 current US$ per person	Sri Lanka
2000s	18.36 current US$ per person	14.12 current US$ per person	4.25 current US$ per person	Cape Verde
2010s	37.43 current US$ per person	31.11 current US$ per person	6.32 current US$ per person	Cape Verde
2020s	48.04 current US$ per person	47.37 current US$ per person	0.6726 current US$ per person	Cape Verde

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per capita, Cape Verde or Sri Lanka?: Cape Verde, at 50.97 current US$ per person against 49.82 current US$ per person in Sri Lanka as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per capita between Cape Verde and Sri Lanka?: 1.15 current US$ per person, with Cape Verde ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and Sri Lanka?: 32 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2021.
How do Cape Verde and Sri Lanka rank globally for adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per capita?: Cape Verde ranks 150th and Sri Lanka ranks 151st of 210 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cape Verde vs Sri Lanka: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 07 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-capita/cabo-verde/sri-lanka/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-capita/cabo-verde/sri-lanka/">Cape Verde vs Sri Lanka: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per capita
Unit: current US$ per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 210 places, 6,886 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed: 01 October 2026

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.