Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Norway: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per capita

Bosnia and Herzegovina
291.84 current US$ per person
in 2021
Norway
293.14 current US$ per person
in 2021
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
47th
Norway rank
46th

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per capita over time

  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • Norway
0100200300199020052021

How they compare

Norway currently reports 293.14 current US$ per person against 291.84 current US$ per person in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a difference of 1.3 current US$ per person.

Across all 32 years both countries report, Norway has been ahead every year.

Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 47th and Norway ranks 46th of 210 countries.

Norway has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bosnia and Herzegovina Norway Difference Ahead
1990s 39.43 current US$ per person 116.99 current US$ per person 77.56 current US$ per person Norway
2000s 96.32 current US$ per person 180.08 current US$ per person 83.77 current US$ per person Norway
2010s 210.18 current US$ per person 257.59 current US$ per person 47.42 current US$ per person Norway
2020s 273.67 current US$ per person 282.97 current US$ per person 9.3 current US$ per person Norway

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per capita, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Norway?
Norway, at 293.14 current US$ per person against 291.84 current US$ per person in Bosnia and Herzegovina as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per capita between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Norway?
1.3 current US$ per person, with Norway ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Norway?
32 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2021.
How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Norway rank globally for adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per capita?
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 47th and Norway ranks 46th of 210 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Norway: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 07 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-capita/bosnia-and-herzegovina/norway/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-capita/bosnia-and-herzegovina/norway/">Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Norway: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per capita
Unit
current US$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
210 places, 6,886 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.