Belgium vs China: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per capita

Belgium
346.81 current US$ per person
in 2021
China
341.63 current US$ per person
in 2021
Belgium rank
35th
China rank
36th

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per capita over time

  • Belgium
  • China
0100200300199020052021

How they compare

Belgium currently reports 346.81 current US$ per person against 341.63 current US$ per person in China, a difference of 5.18 current US$ per person.

Across all 32 years both countries report, Belgium has been ahead every year.

Belgium ranks 35th and China ranks 36th of 210 countries.

Belgium has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belgium China Difference Ahead
1990s 169.85 current US$ per person 35.29 current US$ per person 134.56 current US$ per person Belgium
2000s 240.17 current US$ per person 98.93 current US$ per person 141.24 current US$ per person Belgium
2010s 290.59 current US$ per person 246.63 current US$ per person 43.97 current US$ per person Belgium
2020s 330.69 current US$ per person 326.54 current US$ per person 4.15 current US$ per person Belgium

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per capita, Belgium or China?
Belgium, at 346.81 current US$ per person against 341.63 current US$ per person in China as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per capita between Belgium and China?
5.18 current US$ per person, with Belgium ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and China?
32 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2021.
How do Belgium and China rank globally for adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per capita?
Belgium ranks 35th and China ranks 36th of 210 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belgium vs China: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 07 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-capita/belgium/china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-capita/belgium/china/">Belgium vs China: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per capita
Unit
current US$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
210 places, 6,886 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.