Barbados vs Botswana: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per capita

Barbados
156.41 current US$ per person
in 2021
Botswana
155.31 current US$ per person
in 2021
Barbados rank
99th
Botswana rank
100th

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per capita over time

  • Barbados
  • Botswana
0100200300400500199020052021

How they compare

Barbados currently reports 156.41 current US$ per person against 155.31 current US$ per person in Botswana, a difference of 1.1 current US$ per person.

Across all 32 years both countries report, Barbados has been ahead every year.

Barbados ranks 99th and Botswana ranks 100th of 210 countries.

Barbados has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Barbados Botswana Difference Ahead
1990s 63.71 current US$ per person 32.32 current US$ per person 31.39 current US$ per person Barbados
2000s 154.82 current US$ per person 51.43 current US$ per person 103.39 current US$ per person Barbados
2010s 174.61 current US$ per person 93.22 current US$ per person 81.39 current US$ per person Barbados
2020s 155.45 current US$ per person 140.21 current US$ per person 15.25 current US$ per person Barbados

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per capita, Barbados or Botswana?
Barbados, at 156.41 current US$ per person against 155.31 current US$ per person in Botswana as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per capita between Barbados and Botswana?
1.1 current US$ per person, with Barbados ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Botswana?
32 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2021.
How do Barbados and Botswana rank globally for adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per capita?
Barbados ranks 99th and Botswana ranks 100th of 210 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Barbados vs Botswana: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 07 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-capita/barbados/botswana/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-capita/barbados/botswana/">Barbados vs Botswana: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per capita
Unit
current US$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
210 places, 6,886 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.