Antigua and Barbuda vs Hong Kong: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per capita

Antigua and Barbuda
196.55 current US$ per person
in 2021
Hong Kong
202.15 current US$ per person
in 2021
Antigua and Barbuda rank
73rd
Hong Kong rank
70th

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per capita over time

  • Antigua and Barbuda
  • Hong Kong
0100200300400500197019952021

How they compare

Hong Kong currently reports 202.15 current US$ per person against 196.55 current US$ per person in Antigua and Barbuda, a difference of 5.6 current US$ per person.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Hong Kong ahead.

Antigua and Barbuda ranks 73rd and Hong Kong ranks 70th of 210 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Antigua and Barbuda averaged higher in 1 and Hong Kong in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Antigua and Barbuda Hong Kong Difference Ahead
1990s 60.06 current US$ per person 95.17 current US$ per person 35.11 current US$ per person Hong Kong
2000s 150.59 current US$ per person 143.26 current US$ per person 7.33 current US$ per person Antigua and Barbuda
2010s 200.33 current US$ per person 210.45 current US$ per person 10.12 current US$ per person Hong Kong
2020s 189.84 current US$ per person 193.71 current US$ per person 3.87 current US$ per person Hong Kong

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per capita, Antigua and Barbuda or Hong Kong?
Hong Kong, at 202.15 current US$ per person against 196.55 current US$ per person in Antigua and Barbuda as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per capita between Antigua and Barbuda and Hong Kong?
5.6 current US$ per person, with Hong Kong ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and Hong Kong?
32 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2021.
How do Antigua and Barbuda and Hong Kong rank globally for adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per capita?
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 73rd and Hong Kong ranks 70th of 210 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Antigua and Barbuda vs Hong Kong: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 07 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-capita/antigua-and-barbuda/hong-kong-sar-china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-capita/antigua-and-barbuda/hong-kong-sar-china/">Antigua and Barbuda vs Hong Kong: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per capita
Unit
current US$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
210 places, 6,886 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.