Angola vs Zimbabwe: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per capita

Angola
30.81 current US$ per person
in 2021
Zimbabwe
31.63 current US$ per person
in 2021
Angola rank
167th
Zimbabwe rank
166th

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per capita over time

  • Angola
  • Zimbabwe
10203040199020052021

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 31.63 current US$ per person against 30.81 current US$ per person in Angola, a difference of 0.82 current US$ per person.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Angola ranks 167th and Zimbabwe ranks 166th of 210 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Angola averaged higher in 3 and Zimbabwe in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Angola Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 13.27 current US$ per person 21.65 current US$ per person 8.38 current US$ per person Zimbabwe
2000s 20.61 current US$ per person 19 current US$ per person 1.61 current US$ per person Angola
2010s 32.43 current US$ per person 27.64 current US$ per person 4.79 current US$ per person Angola
2020s 30.28 current US$ per person 30.12 current US$ per person 0.1551 current US$ per person Angola

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per capita, Angola or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 31.63 current US$ per person against 30.81 current US$ per person in Angola as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per capita between Angola and Zimbabwe?
0.82 current US$ per person, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Zimbabwe?
32 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2021.
How do Angola and Zimbabwe rank globally for adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per capita?
Angola ranks 167th and Zimbabwe ranks 166th of 210 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Angola vs Zimbabwe: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 07 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-capita/angola/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-capita/angola/zimbabwe/">Angola vs Zimbabwe: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per capita
Unit
current US$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
210 places, 6,886 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.