New Caledonia vs South Sudan: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) … annual

New Caledonia
9.56 % change on previous year
in 2021
South Sudan
9.51 % change on previous year
in 2021
New Caledonia rank
123rd
South Sudan rank
124th

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) … annual over time

  • New Caledonia
  • South Sudan
-2002040197119962021

How they compare

New Caledonia currently reports 9.56 % change on previous year against 9.51 % change on previous year in South Sudan, a difference of 0.05 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 16 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1991 it was New Caledonia ahead.

New Caledonia ranks 123rd and South Sudan ranks 124th of 210 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, New Caledonia averaged higher in 3 and South Sudan in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade New Caledonia South Sudan Difference Ahead
1990s 6.59 % change on previous year 5.85 % change on previous year 0.7346 % change on previous year New Caledonia
2000s 9.53 % change on previous year 17.32 % change on previous year 7.79 % change on previous year South Sudan
2010s 10.92 % change on previous year 7.49 % change on previous year 3.42 % change on previous year New Caledonia
2020s 8 % change on previous year 7.87 % change on previous year 0.1273 % change on previous year New Caledonia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), annual growth, New Caledonia or South Sudan?
New Caledonia, at 9.56 % change on previous year against 9.51 % change on previous year in South Sudan as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), annual growth between New Caledonia and South Sudan?
0.05 % change on previous year, with New Caledonia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for New Caledonia and South Sudan?
31 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2021.
How do New Caledonia and South Sudan rank globally for adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), annual growth?
New Caledonia ranks 123rd and South Sudan ranks 124th of 210 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

New Caledonia vs South Sudan: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), annual growth. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 07 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-annual-growth-rate/new-caledonia/south-sudan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-annual-growth-rate/new-caledonia/south-sudan/">New Caledonia vs South Sudan: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), annual growth</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
210 places, 6,673 data points, 1971–2021
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.