Faroe Islands vs Zimbabwe: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) … annual

Faroe Islands
12.35 % change on previous year
in 2021
Zimbabwe
12.45 % change on previous year
in 2021
Faroe Islands rank
73rd
Zimbabwe rank
71st

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) … annual over time

  • Faroe Islands
  • Zimbabwe
-20-100102030199120062021

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 12.45 % change on previous year against 12.35 % change on previous year in Faroe Islands, a difference of 0.1 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 15 times across 29 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Faroe Islands ahead.

Faroe Islands ranks 73rd and Zimbabwe ranks 71st of 210 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Faroe Islands averaged higher in 3 and Zimbabwe in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Faroe Islands Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 6.59 % change on previous year 2.02 % change on previous year 4.56 % change on previous year Faroe Islands
2000s 4.83 % change on previous year -2.19 % change on previous year 7.02 % change on previous year Faroe Islands
2010s 6.45 % change on previous year 9.05 % change on previous year 2.61 % change on previous year Zimbabwe
2020s 3.74 % change on previous year 2.55 % change on previous year 1.19 % change on previous year Faroe Islands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), annual growth, Faroe Islands or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 12.45 % change on previous year against 12.35 % change on previous year in Faroe Islands as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), annual growth between Faroe Islands and Zimbabwe?
0.1 % change on previous year, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Faroe Islands and Zimbabwe?
29 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2021.
How do Faroe Islands and Zimbabwe rank globally for adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), annual growth?
Faroe Islands ranks 73rd and Zimbabwe ranks 71st of 210 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Faroe Islands vs Zimbabwe: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), annual growth. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 07 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-annual-growth-rate/faroe-islands/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-annual-growth-rate/faroe-islands/zimbabwe/">Faroe Islands vs Zimbabwe: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), annual growth</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
210 places, 6,673 data points, 1971–2021
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.