Ecuador vs New Caledonia: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) … annual

Ecuador
9.58 % change on previous year
in 2021
New Caledonia
9.56 % change on previous year
in 2021
Ecuador rank
122nd
New Caledonia rank
123rd

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) … annual over time

  • Ecuador
  • New Caledonia
-2002040197119962021

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 9.58 % change on previous year against 9.56 % change on previous year in New Caledonia, a difference of 0.02 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 17 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1991 it was New Caledonia ahead.

Ecuador ranks 122nd and New Caledonia ranks 123rd of 210 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 2 and New Caledonia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador New Caledonia Difference Ahead
1990s 8.64 % change on previous year 6.59 % change on previous year 2.05 % change on previous year Ecuador
2000s 9.58 % change on previous year 9.53 % change on previous year 0.0589 % change on previous year Ecuador
2010s 5.43 % change on previous year 10.92 % change on previous year 5.49 % change on previous year New Caledonia
2020s 1.79 % change on previous year 8 % change on previous year 6.22 % change on previous year New Caledonia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), annual growth, Ecuador or New Caledonia?
Ecuador, at 9.58 % change on previous year against 9.56 % change on previous year in New Caledonia as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), annual growth between Ecuador and New Caledonia?
0.02 % change on previous year, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and New Caledonia?
31 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2021.
How do Ecuador and New Caledonia rank globally for adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), annual growth?
Ecuador ranks 122nd and New Caledonia ranks 123rd of 210 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs New Caledonia: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), annual growth. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 07 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-annual-growth-rate/ecuador/new-caledonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-annual-growth-rate/ecuador/new-caledonia/">Ecuador vs New Caledonia: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), annual growth</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
210 places, 6,673 data points, 1971–2021
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.