Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Faroe Islands: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) … annual

Bosnia and Herzegovina
12.34 % change on previous year
in 2021
Faroe Islands
12.35 % change on previous year
in 2021
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
74th
Faroe Islands rank
73rd

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) … annual over time

  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • Faroe Islands
-100-50050100199120062021

How they compare

Faroe Islands currently reports 12.35 % change on previous year against 12.34 % change on previous year in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a difference of 0.01 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 14 times across 29 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Faroe Islands ahead.

Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 74th and Faroe Islands ranks 73rd of 210 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Bosnia and Herzegovina averaged higher in 3 and Faroe Islands in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bosnia and Herzegovina Faroe Islands Difference Ahead
1990s 13.78 % change on previous year 6.59 % change on previous year 7.19 % change on previous year Bosnia and Herzegovina
2000s 12.17 % change on previous year 4.83 % change on previous year 7.34 % change on previous year Bosnia and Herzegovina
2010s 4.51 % change on previous year 6.45 % change on previous year 1.94 % change on previous year Faroe Islands
2020s 5.23 % change on previous year 3.74 % change on previous year 1.49 % change on previous year Bosnia and Herzegovina

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), annual growth, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Faroe Islands?
Faroe Islands, at 12.35 % change on previous year against 12.34 % change on previous year in Bosnia and Herzegovina as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), annual growth between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Faroe Islands?
0.01 % change on previous year, with Faroe Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Faroe Islands?
29 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2021.
How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Faroe Islands rank globally for adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), annual growth?
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 74th and Faroe Islands ranks 73rd of 210 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Faroe Islands: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), annual growth. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 07 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-annual-growth-rate/bosnia-and-herzegovina/faroe-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-annual-growth-rate/bosnia-and-herzegovina/faroe-islands/">Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Faroe Islands: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), annual growth</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
210 places, 6,673 data points, 1971–2021
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.