Belgium vs Tanzania: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) … annual

Belgium
10.7 % change on previous year
in 2021
Tanzania
10.7 % change on previous year
in 2021
Belgium rank
104th
Tanzania rank
103rd

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) … annual over time

  • Belgium
  • Tanzania
02040199120062021

How they compare

Tanzania currently reports 10.7 % change on previous year against 10.7 % change on previous year in Belgium, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Belgium ahead.

Belgium ranks 104th and Tanzania ranks 103rd of 210 countries.

Tanzania has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belgium Tanzania Difference Ahead
1990s 5.03 % change on previous year 8.68 % change on previous year 3.66 % change on previous year Tanzania
2000s 3.06 % change on previous year 14.38 % change on previous year 11.32 % change on previous year Tanzania
2010s 3.36 % change on previous year 12.29 % change on previous year 8.92 % change on previous year Tanzania
2020s 3.2 % change on previous year 7.84 % change on previous year 4.64 % change on previous year Tanzania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), annual growth, Belgium or Tanzania?
Tanzania, at 10.7 % change on previous year against 10.7 % change on previous year in Belgium as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), annual growth between Belgium and Tanzania?
0 % change on previous year, with Tanzania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Tanzania?
31 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2021.
How do Belgium and Tanzania rank globally for adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), annual growth?
Belgium ranks 104th and Tanzania ranks 103rd of 210 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belgium vs Tanzania: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), annual growth. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 07 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-annual-growth-rate/belgium/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-annual-growth-rate/belgium/tanzania/">Belgium vs Tanzania: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), annual growth</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
210 places, 6,673 data points, 1971–2021
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.