Belarus vs Norway: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) … annual

Belarus
7.89 % change on previous year
in 2021
Norway
8.03 % change on previous year
in 2021
Belarus rank
155th
Norway rank
152nd

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) … annual over time

  • Belarus
  • Norway
-1001020199120062021

How they compare

Norway currently reports 8.03 % change on previous year against 7.89 % change on previous year in Belarus, a difference of 0.14 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 17 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Belarus ahead.

Belarus ranks 155th and Norway ranks 152nd of 210 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 3 and Norway in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Norway Difference Ahead
1990s -2.19 % change on previous year 8.02 % change on previous year 10.21 % change on previous year Norway
2000s 5.06 % change on previous year 4.06 % change on previous year 1.01 % change on previous year Belarus
2010s 4.12 % change on previous year 3.64 % change on previous year 0.4867 % change on previous year Belarus
2020s 4.71 % change on previous year 4.07 % change on previous year 0.6414 % change on previous year Belarus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), annual growth, Belarus or Norway?
Norway, at 8.03 % change on previous year against 7.89 % change on previous year in Belarus as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), annual growth between Belarus and Norway?
0.14 % change on previous year, with Norway ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Norway?
31 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2021.
How do Belarus and Norway rank globally for adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), annual growth?
Belarus ranks 155th and Norway ranks 152nd of 210 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Norway: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), annual growth. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 07 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-annual-growth-rate/belarus/norway/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-annual-growth-rate/belarus/norway/">Belarus vs Norway: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), annual growth</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
210 places, 6,673 data points, 1971–2021
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.