Bangladesh vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) … annual

Bangladesh
14.23 % change on previous year
in 2021
Turks and Caicos Islands
13.72 % change on previous year
in 2021
Bangladesh rank
51st
Turks and Caicos Islands rank
53rd

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) … annual over time

  • Bangladesh
  • Turks and Caicos Islands
0200400600199120062021

How they compare

Bangladesh currently reports 14.23 % change on previous year against 13.72 % change on previous year in Turks and Caicos Islands, a difference of 0.51 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Bangladesh ahead.

Bangladesh ranks 51st and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 53rd of 210 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Bangladesh averaged higher in 2 and Turks and Caicos Islands in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bangladesh Turks and Caicos Islands Difference Ahead
2000s 11.99 % change on previous year 86.54 % change on previous year 74.55 % change on previous year Turks and Caicos Islands
2010s 11.63 % change on previous year 6.16 % change on previous year 5.48 % change on previous year Bangladesh
2020s 10.68 % change on previous year 0.4731 % change on previous year 10.2 % change on previous year Bangladesh

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), annual growth, Bangladesh or Turks and Caicos Islands?
Bangladesh, at 14.23 % change on previous year against 13.72 % change on previous year in Turks and Caicos Islands as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), annual growth between Bangladesh and Turks and Caicos Islands?
0.51 % change on previous year, with Bangladesh ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Turks and Caicos Islands?
20 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2021.
How do Bangladesh and Turks and Caicos Islands rank globally for adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), annual growth?
Bangladesh ranks 51st and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 53rd of 210 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bangladesh vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), annual growth. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 07 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-annual-growth-rate/bangladesh/turks-and-caicos-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-annual-growth-rate/bangladesh/turks-and-caicos-islands/">Bangladesh vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), annual growth</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
210 places, 6,673 data points, 1971–2021
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.