Papua New Guinea vs Zimbabwe: Adjusted net savings per capita
Papua New Guinea
28.41 current US$
in 2004
Zimbabwe
19.52 current US$
in 2020
Papua New Guinea rank
121st
Zimbabwe rank
124th
Adjusted net savings per capita over time
- Papua New Guinea
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Papua New Guinea currently reports 28.41 current US$ against 19.52 current US$ in Zimbabwe, a difference of 8.89 current US$.
That makes Papua New Guinea's figure about 1.5 times Zimbabwe's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Papua New Guinea ranks 121st and Zimbabwe ranks 124th of 159 countries.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adjusted net savings per capita, Papua New Guinea or Zimbabwe?
- Papua New Guinea, at 28.41 current US$ against 19.52 current US$ in Zimbabwe as of 2004.
- What is the difference in adjusted net savings per capita between Papua New Guinea and Zimbabwe?
- 8.89 current US$, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Papua New Guinea and Zimbabwe?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 1994.
- How do Papua New Guinea and Zimbabwe rank globally for adjusted net savings per capita?
- Papua New Guinea ranks 121st and Zimbabwe ranks 124th of 159 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank staff estimates based on sources and methods in World Bank's "The Changing Wealth of Nations: Measuring Sustainable Development in the New Millennium" (2011), published as Adjusted net savings per capita (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Adjusted net savings are equal to net national savings plus education expenditure and minus energy depletion, mineral depletion, net forest depletion, and carbon dioxide and particulate emissions damage.