Nicaragua vs Zambia: Adjusted net savings per capita
Nicaragua
230.83 current US$
in 2021
Zambia
208.78 current US$
in 2020
Nicaragua rank
92nd
Zambia rank
94th
Adjusted net savings per capita over time
- Nicaragua
- Zambia
How they compare
Nicaragua currently reports 230.83 current US$ against 208.78 current US$ in Zambia, a difference of 22.05 current US$.
That makes Nicaragua's figure about 1.1 times Zambia's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Nicaragua ahead.
Nicaragua ranks 92nd and Zambia ranks 94th of 159 countries.
Nicaragua has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nicaragua | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 264.29 current US$ | 229.89 current US$ | 34.41 current US$ | Nicaragua |
| 2020s | 301.71 current US$ | 208.78 current US$ | 92.93 current US$ | Nicaragua |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adjusted net savings per capita, Nicaragua or Zambia?
- Nicaragua, at 230.83 current US$ against 208.78 current US$ in Zambia as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adjusted net savings per capita between Nicaragua and Zambia?
- 22.05 current US$, with Nicaragua ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nicaragua and Zambia?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2020.
- How do Nicaragua and Zambia rank globally for adjusted net savings per capita?
- Nicaragua ranks 92nd and Zambia ranks 94th of 159 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank staff estimates based on sources and methods in World Bank's "The Changing Wealth of Nations: Measuring Sustainable Development in the New Millennium" (2011), published as Adjusted net savings per capita (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Adjusted net savings are equal to net national savings plus education expenditure and minus energy depletion, mineral depletion, net forest depletion, and carbon dioxide and particulate emissions damage.