Mozambique vs Uganda: Adjusted net savings per capita
Mozambique
-33.6 current US$
in 2021
Uganda
-33.76 current US$
in 2021
Mozambique rank
136th
Uganda rank
137th
Adjusted net savings per capita over time
- Mozambique
- Uganda
How they compare
Mozambique currently reports -33.6 current US$ against -33.76 current US$ in Uganda, a difference of 0.16 current US$.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Uganda ahead.
Mozambique ranks 136th and Uganda ranks 137th of 159 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Mozambique averaged higher in 1 and Uganda in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mozambique | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 10.97 current US$ | -5.61 current US$ | 16.58 current US$ | Mozambique |
| 2010s | -13.31 current US$ | -10.25 current US$ | 3.06 current US$ | Uganda |
| 2020s | -25.81 current US$ | -21.18 current US$ | 4.63 current US$ | Uganda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adjusted net savings per capita, Mozambique or Uganda?
- Mozambique, at -33.6 current US$ against -33.76 current US$ in Uganda as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adjusted net savings per capita between Mozambique and Uganda?
- 0.16 current US$, with Mozambique ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mozambique and Uganda?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2021.
- How do Mozambique and Uganda rank globally for adjusted net savings per capita?
- Mozambique ranks 136th and Uganda ranks 137th of 159 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank staff estimates based on sources and methods in World Bank's "The Changing Wealth of Nations: Measuring Sustainable Development in the New Millennium" (2011), published as Adjusted net savings per capita (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Adjusted net savings are equal to net national savings plus education expenditure and minus energy depletion, mineral depletion, net forest depletion, and carbon dioxide and particulate emissions damage.