Mauritius vs Rwanda: Adjusted net savings per capita
Mauritius
0.3365 current US$
in 2021
Rwanda
-12.07 current US$
in 2021
Mauritius rank
126th
Rwanda rank
128th
Adjusted net savings per capita over time
- Mauritius
- Rwanda
How they compare
Mauritius currently reports 0.3365 current US$ against -12.07 current US$ in Rwanda, a difference of 12.41 current US$.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Mauritius ahead.
Mauritius ranks 126th and Rwanda ranks 128th of 159 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Mauritius averaged higher in 1 and Rwanda in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritius | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 114.16 current US$ | -23.5 current US$ | 137.66 current US$ | Mauritius |
| 2020s | -150.09 current US$ | -22.01 current US$ | 128.08 current US$ | Rwanda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adjusted net savings per capita, Mauritius or Rwanda?
- Mauritius, at 0.3365 current US$ against -12.07 current US$ in Rwanda as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adjusted net savings per capita between Mauritius and Rwanda?
- 12.41 current US$, with Mauritius ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Rwanda?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2021.
- How do Mauritius and Rwanda rank globally for adjusted net savings per capita?
- Mauritius ranks 126th and Rwanda ranks 128th of 159 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank staff estimates based on sources and methods in World Bank's "The Changing Wealth of Nations: Measuring Sustainable Development in the New Millennium" (2011), published as Adjusted net savings per capita (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Adjusted net savings are equal to net national savings plus education expenditure and minus energy depletion, mineral depletion, net forest depletion, and carbon dioxide and particulate emissions damage.