Madagascar vs Rwanda: Adjusted net savings per capita
Madagascar
-15.98 current US$
in 2021
Rwanda
-12.07 current US$
in 2021
Madagascar rank
130th
Rwanda rank
128th
Adjusted net savings per capita over time
- Madagascar
- Rwanda
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports -12.07 current US$ against -15.98 current US$ in Madagascar, a difference of 3.91 current US$.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Madagascar ahead.
Madagascar ranks 130th and Rwanda ranks 128th of 159 countries.
Madagascar has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Madagascar | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | -5.11 current US$ | -23.5 current US$ | 18.39 current US$ | Madagascar |
| 2020s | -17.71 current US$ | -22.01 current US$ | 4.3 current US$ | Madagascar |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adjusted net savings per capita, Madagascar or Rwanda?
- Rwanda, at -12.07 current US$ against -15.98 current US$ in Madagascar as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adjusted net savings per capita between Madagascar and Rwanda?
- 3.91 current US$, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Madagascar and Rwanda?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2021.
- How do Madagascar and Rwanda rank globally for adjusted net savings per capita?
- Madagascar ranks 130th and Rwanda ranks 128th of 159 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank staff estimates based on sources and methods in World Bank's "The Changing Wealth of Nations: Measuring Sustainable Development in the New Millennium" (2011), published as Adjusted net savings per capita (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Adjusted net savings are equal to net national savings plus education expenditure and minus energy depletion, mineral depletion, net forest depletion, and carbon dioxide and particulate emissions damage.