Luxembourg vs Qatar: Adjusted net savings per capita
Luxembourg
18,992 current US$
in 2021
Qatar
16,765 current US$
in 2021
Luxembourg rank
2nd
Qatar rank
4th
Adjusted net savings per capita over time
- Luxembourg
- Qatar
How they compare
Luxembourg currently reports 18,992 current US$ against 16,765 current US$ in Qatar, a difference of 2,227 current US$.
That makes Luxembourg's figure about 1.1 times Qatar's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Qatar ahead.
Luxembourg ranks 2nd and Qatar ranks 4th of 159 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Luxembourg averaged higher in 1 and Qatar in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Luxembourg | Qatar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 13,639 current US$ | 20,861 current US$ | 7,223 current US$ | Qatar |
| 2020s | 15,660 current US$ | 12,973 current US$ | 2,687 current US$ | Luxembourg |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adjusted net savings per capita, Luxembourg or Qatar?
- Luxembourg, at 18,992 current US$ against 16,765 current US$ in Qatar as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adjusted net savings per capita between Luxembourg and Qatar?
- 2,227 current US$, with Luxembourg ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Luxembourg and Qatar?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2021.
- How do Luxembourg and Qatar rank globally for adjusted net savings per capita?
- Luxembourg ranks 2nd and Qatar ranks 4th of 159 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank staff estimates based on sources and methods in World Bank's "The Changing Wealth of Nations: Measuring Sustainable Development in the New Millennium" (2011), published as Adjusted net savings per capita (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Adjusted net savings are equal to net national savings plus education expenditure and minus energy depletion, mineral depletion, net forest depletion, and carbon dioxide and particulate emissions damage.