Kuwait vs New Zealand: Adjusted net savings per capita
Kuwait
4,401 current US$
in 2019
New Zealand
4,728 current US$
in 2021
Kuwait rank
19th
New Zealand rank
17th
Adjusted net savings per capita over time
- Kuwait
- New Zealand
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 4,728 current US$ against 4,401 current US$ in Kuwait, a difference of 327 current US$.
That makes New Zealand's figure about 1.1 times Kuwait's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Kuwait ahead.
Kuwait ranks 19th and New Zealand ranks 17th of 159 countries.
Kuwait has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kuwait | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 11,060 current US$ | 2,022 current US$ | 9,038 current US$ | Kuwait |
| 2010s | 10,168 current US$ | 4,788 current US$ | 5,380 current US$ | Kuwait |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adjusted net savings per capita, Kuwait or New Zealand?
- New Zealand, at 4,728 current US$ against 4,401 current US$ in Kuwait as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adjusted net savings per capita between Kuwait and New Zealand?
- 327 current US$, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kuwait and New Zealand?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2019.
- How do Kuwait and New Zealand rank globally for adjusted net savings per capita?
- Kuwait ranks 19th and New Zealand ranks 17th of 159 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank staff estimates based on sources and methods in World Bank's "The Changing Wealth of Nations: Measuring Sustainable Development in the New Millennium" (2011), published as Adjusted net savings per capita (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Adjusted net savings are equal to net national savings plus education expenditure and minus energy depletion, mineral depletion, net forest depletion, and carbon dioxide and particulate emissions damage.