Guyana vs Mauritius: Adjusted net savings per capita
Guyana
21.4 current US$
in 2005
Mauritius
0.3365 current US$
in 2021
Guyana rank
123rd
Mauritius rank
126th
Adjusted net savings per capita over time
- Guyana
- Mauritius
How they compare
Guyana currently reports 21.4 current US$ against 0.3365 current US$ in Mauritius, a difference of 21.06 current US$.
That makes Guyana's figure about 63.6 times Mauritius's.
Across all 14 years both countries report, Mauritius has been ahead every year.
Guyana ranks 123rd and Mauritius ranks 126th of 159 countries.
Mauritius has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guyana | Mauritius | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -49.61 current US$ | 655.49 current US$ | 705.1 current US$ | Mauritius |
| 2000s | -23.19 current US$ | 754.8 current US$ | 778 current US$ | Mauritius |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adjusted net savings per capita, Guyana or Mauritius?
- Guyana, at 21.4 current US$ against 0.3365 current US$ in Mauritius as of 2005.
- What is the difference in adjusted net savings per capita between Guyana and Mauritius?
- 21.06 current US$, with Guyana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guyana and Mauritius?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2005.
- How do Guyana and Mauritius rank globally for adjusted net savings per capita?
- Guyana ranks 123rd and Mauritius ranks 126th of 159 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank staff estimates based on sources and methods in World Bank's "The Changing Wealth of Nations: Measuring Sustainable Development in the New Millennium" (2011), published as Adjusted net savings per capita (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Adjusted net savings are equal to net national savings plus education expenditure and minus energy depletion, mineral depletion, net forest depletion, and carbon dioxide and particulate emissions damage.