Guyana vs Malaysia: Adjusted net savings per capita
Guyana
21.4 current US$
in 2005
Malaysia
38.88 current US$
in 2021
Guyana rank
123rd
Malaysia rank
120th
Adjusted net savings per capita over time
- Guyana
- Malaysia
How they compare
Malaysia currently reports 38.88 current US$ against 21.4 current US$ in Guyana, a difference of 17.48 current US$.
That makes Malaysia's figure about 1.8 times Guyana's.
Across all 14 years both countries report, Malaysia has been ahead every year.
Guyana ranks 123rd and Malaysia ranks 120th of 159 countries.
Malaysia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guyana | Malaysia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -49.61 current US$ | 350.61 current US$ | 400.22 current US$ | Malaysia |
| 2000s | -23.19 current US$ | 441.04 current US$ | 464.23 current US$ | Malaysia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adjusted net savings per capita, Guyana or Malaysia?
- Malaysia, at 38.88 current US$ against 21.4 current US$ in Guyana as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adjusted net savings per capita between Guyana and Malaysia?
- 17.48 current US$, with Malaysia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guyana and Malaysia?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2005.
- How do Guyana and Malaysia rank globally for adjusted net savings per capita?
- Guyana ranks 123rd and Malaysia ranks 120th of 159 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank staff estimates based on sources and methods in World Bank's "The Changing Wealth of Nations: Measuring Sustainable Development in the New Millennium" (2011), published as Adjusted net savings per capita (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Adjusted net savings are equal to net national savings plus education expenditure and minus energy depletion, mineral depletion, net forest depletion, and carbon dioxide and particulate emissions damage.